

QA hiring built by QA people
HyreTester exists because generalist recruiters can't assess a Selenium suite or read a test coverage report. We stopped doing general hiring so we could do QA hiring obsessively well.
Generalist recruiters cost QA teams months
Every QA manager we spoke to had the same story: six months of CVs from recruiters who couldn't tell Cypress from Cucumber. We built HyreTester to eliminate that gap entirely.
The 72-hour placement window isn't a marketing claim — it's only possible because our entire network is QA-only. Every candidate is already screened before you ask.
Three screens every candidate must pass
01 — Write Test Cases
02 — Debug Automation
03 — Internal QA Screen
A senior QA engineer from our team runs a live technical review — covering test strategy, tool choices, and edge-case reasoning. Only those who pass enter the active network.
Candidates receive an unrehearsed feature spec and write functional test cases from scratch. No templates, no hints — just applied QA thinking under time pressure.
A broken Selenium or Playwright suite lands in their hands. They diagnose the failures, fix the flaky selectors, and explain the root cause — in writing.


Software testers, not HR generalists
Everyone who sources and screens at HyreTester has a background in software testing — not general recruitment. That difference is the product.
